On September 6, 2011, in its second item of business after its August break, the United States Senate approved a procedural motion to invoke “cloture” on the House patent reform bill (HR 1249). This vote spares patent reform from any filibuster, prevents the introduction of new amendments, and sets a 30-hour limit on further debate. The Senate is expected to schedule final debate and vote on the bill very soon.
It is not yet clear whether any amendments were introduced before the final deadline. If not, and the Senate approves the House bill without amendment, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act could become law within a few days. On the other hand, if the Senate approves any amendments, the amended version of the bill would have to go back to the House for its consideration.
The cloture vote was nearly unanimous at 93-5. One notable “nay” vote came from Senator Coburn (R) who wants to save the USPTO from fee diversion. I can’t criticize him for standing his ground on this issue, but before the cloture vote, Senator Leahy exhorted his fellow Senators to approve HR 1249 without further amendment and delay, even if it is not the bill that he or she would have written.
In Senator Leahy’s words:
We can no longer stand on a 1950’s patent system and expect our innovators to flourish in a 21st century world. Let’s go from the 50’s into the 21st century and then just unleash the genius of the American people and our inventors in the United States of America!
With patent reform about to clear its last hurdle, it is time to start preparing for the changes it will bring. Indeed, as outlined in this article, some provisions of HR 1249 have an immediate effective date, and many others will have a retroactive effect.
You can follow further developments on patent reform here and on Foley’s patent reform webpage.
If you appreciate this article, please consider nominating PharmaPatentsBlog for the ABA Journal’s annual list of the top 100 legal blogs.
This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney.
This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary.
The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites.
In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.